Sensory Fatigue in Individuals with Autism: A Contemporary Concept in the Scientific Literature

The article reviews the concepts of sensory fatigue and sensory masking as emerging trends in autism research, highlighting their impact on mental health, quality of life, and daily participation. It also discusses the importance of creating sensory-supportive environments and developing educational and guidance practices based on the lived experiences of individuals with autism.

In recent years, there has been a notable shift in the understanding of sensory experiences among individuals with autism. While traditional studies focused primarily on describing heightened or reduced responses to sensory stimuli as symptoms associated with autism, contemporary research has increasingly explored how these sensory experiences affect daily life, mental health, and quality of life. This shift has led to the emergence of new concepts, most notably sensory fatigue and sensory masking, both of which have gained growing attention in the current scientific literature.

Sensory fatigue refers to a state of physical, emotional, and cognitive exhaustion resulting from continuous exposure to sensory stimuli that are difficult for an individual to process or adapt to. Individuals with autism may experience sounds, lights, smells, or sensory situations that place ongoing demands on the nervous system, leading over time to stress, exhaustion, difficulty concentrating, and a reduced ability to engage effectively with their surroundings.

Recent studies suggest that sensory fatigue is not solely related to direct sensory stimuli but may also be influenced by accompanying social and environmental demands. Spending extended periods in crowded or noisy environments can consume considerable psychological and cognitive energy, increasing the likelihood of fatigue, withdrawal, and daily exhaustion.

A related contemporary concept is sensory masking, which refers to an individual’s attempt to hide, suppress, or adapt their natural sensory responses in order to avoid drawing attention or to conform to prevailing social expectations. Some individuals with autism may try to tolerate unpleasant sounds, bright lighting, or suppress self-regulatory behaviors associated with sensory experiences despite feeling uncomfortable.

Research indicates that sensory masking may temporarily help individuals adapt to their environments; however, maintaining such efforts over long periods may be associated with increased levels of anxiety, stress, and psychological fatigue. Consequently, researchers have begun to view sensory masking as one of the factors that may contribute to exhaustion and fatigue among some individuals with autism.

One of the important contributions of recent research has been the emphasis on the lived experiences of autistic individuals themselves. Personal accounts have revealed that sensory challenges extend beyond temporary discomfort and may affect social participation, academic or occupational performance, mental health, and overall well-being and quality of life.

Recent studies have also highlighted links between sensory difficulties and a range of related issues, including sleep disturbances, anxiety, chronic stress, and emotional regulation difficulties. Evidence suggests that the cumulative impact of sensory stressors over time may reduce both psychological and physical energy and limit an individual’s ability to participate actively in everyday activities.

From a guidance and intervention perspective, studies emphasize the importance of moving beyond efforts focused solely on changing individual behavior and toward creating environments that are more responsive to sensory needs. This includes reducing overwhelming sensory stimuli whenever possible, providing quiet spaces for recovery, respecting individual sensory differences, teaching self-regulation strategies, and increasing awareness among families and educators regarding the nature and impact of sensory experiences in daily life.

Contemporary research trends suggest that understanding sensory fatigue and sensory masking provides a more comprehensive picture of the experiences of individuals with autism and supports the development of educational and guidance practices that are more responsive to their needs. This perspective also reflects a broader shift from focusing primarily on symptoms to emphasizing quality of life, psychological well-being, and meaningful participation in society.

References

  • Lane, S. J., Leão, M. A., & Spielmann, V. (2022). Sleep, Sensory Integration/Processing, and Autism: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  • Schauder, K. B., & Bennetto, L. (2016). Toward an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Sensory Dysfunction in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Integration of the Neural and Symptom Literatures. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.
  • Rogers, S. J., & Ozonoff, S. (2005). Annotation: What Do We Know About Sensory Dysfunction in Autism? A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1255–1268.
  • Belek, B. (2019). Articulating Sensory Sensitivity: From Bodies with Autism to Autistic Bodies. Medical Anthropology, 38(6), 543–556.
  • Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Rethinking Autism: Implications of Sensory and Movement Differences for Understanding and Support. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6.
  • Zoccante, L., Ciceri, M. L., Gozzi, L. A., et al. (2022). The Connectivome Theory: A New Model to Understand Autism Spectrum Disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.
  • Higgins, J. M., Arnold, S. R. C., Weise, J., Pellicano, E., et al. (2021). Defining Autistic Burnout Through Experts by Lived Experience: Grounded Delphi Method Investigating #AutisticBurnout. Autism, 25(8), 2356–2369.
  • Poulsen, R., Heyworth, M., Chan, T., & Tan, D. W. (2025). A Theoretical Perspective of Autistic Sensory Masking.
  • O’Donoghue, S.. Read Between the Signs: Autism, Sensory Experience and Narrative Invention. Critical Neurodiversity Studies.